CO129-265 - Public Offices & Others - 1894 — Page 30

4

(1) by the omission of

5. 2, since there is no need to cut out the

definition of

of a trothed "Contained

in the Ordinance of

1888;

(2) and mitead of 5.4,

I think it better that

a section should be

introduced, repealing 5.14 and

subsection (2) of 5.12

the Ordinance of

1888,

and amending

5.13of

that Ordinance

by niserting at the and of subsection (1) the word,, "and also " if so required by the

" Protector to produce

[This agree

with what is said in

draft to

Hangkey]

Cur

A

In first subsection

L

Such wanan

or girl

27

"in the absence of

"reasmable Excuse

proof whereof shall

"lie

1 My

the axensed"

rearmı

for

suggesting the repeal of obsection (2) of

5.12 of the Order of 1888 is because it

confers powers which

seem

tome

capable

of rescate serious

abuse b

the Inspector,

and Andeconst affor

is this direction.

them

appears to provide probe required for

purpose of resening

all that is

women confined against their will.

7. Irequest zu.

Page 30Page 31